Information and discussion on all aspects of British photographic history
Butlin’s Photographic Services was a joint venture between Butlin’s and one of the companies within the Ilford Group. I would like to hear from anybody that worked as a photographer or in the…Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by Nettie Edwards Nov 29, 2012.
Did any member of this forum work in the developing and printing trade? Some companies diversified into specialist services to professional photographers like John Slater Photography Ltd of Newmarket…Continue
Started Oct 2, 2012
I am interested in commercial seaside photography, beach photographers, comic head-through photographs and walking photographs know by those in the trade as “walkies.” I was born in Great Yarmouth…Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by Gavin Maitland Oct 18, 2012.
Paul Godfrey has not received any gifts yet
Paul Godfrey commented on Karen Shepherdson's blog post SEAS Photography website goes live
Paul Godfrey commented on pete.boswell's blog post Hills & Saunders Photographers
Paul Godfrey replied to Gavin Maitland's discussion Seaside Tintypes:
Paul Godfrey commented on Karen Shepherdson's photo
Karen Shepherdson left a comment for Paul Godfrey
Paul Godfrey commented on Michael Pritchard's blog post Anniversaries in 2013
Paul Godfrey commented on Michael Pritchard's blog post Anniversaries in 2013
Paul Godfrey replied to Robert Gray's discussion Sims Brothers - Photographers
Nettie Edwards replied to Paul Godfrey's discussion Butlin's Photographic Services Limited
Paul Godfrey posted a discussion
Gavin Maitland replied to Paul Godfrey's discussion Seaside Photographers
A discussion started by Paul Godfrey was featured
Paul Godfrey posted a discussion
Terence Baggett left a comment for Paul Godfrey
Roger Mead replied to Paul Godfrey's discussion Seaside Photographers
Paul Godfrey replied to Paul Godfrey's discussion Seaside Photographers
Karen Shepherdson said… Hello Dear Paul,
At last I am connecting with BPH and to my delight with you. SEAS Photography is now underway, busy archiving the Sunbeam Collection - it is sheer joy! Our website hopefully goes live next month and activities begin in ernest from this summer. We will of course keep you posted.
So lovely to find your message on a grey Sunday morning.
K
Terence Baggett said… Paul, hi. I hope you have received the group photo I sent (as per direction).
I'll try to answer your queries on darkroom/processing as well as I can but bulk processing was not my field and I realise I may have mislead you slightly already.
The size of print I am able to take from a few examples I still have. The picture is a little under 60x80mm on card that is a little under 70x90mm. These were printed 3-up on a strip and cut with a guillotine in the kiosk when sold.
I think, on reflection, that Chambers referred to the printer as an Enprinter and not a Kenprinter as I mistakenly reported and the prints were called enprints although these names are similar enough to get me confused. The numbers were printed on the strip, almost certainly during printing but I don't know if the developing was done inside the machine or in the large tanks that surrounded the printer. The paper/card is thicker than my later colour photos, so could be double weight. Chambers used a glazer drum to dry not glaze - reverse side down on the heated drum - before being cut into strips of 3 prints; so I know the prints were processed on a long roll of paper. they were processed in a similar way to the negatives (rolled on a spindle separated by a plastic strip of the same size). I saw them in their final process when I went across the road to change/cut film.
I know that the mix in the tanks was around 5-10% stronger than as directed and the development temperature was a little high; this speeded up the processing and the increased grain was not noticeable. With up to 9 camera operators each taking 800-1,000 shots per day the processing had to be fast to meet set times for customers to get their pics.
I remember the smells well. The chemicals were not particularly dangerous but the developer and the hypo had very distinctive smell and I remember with more concern a tub of bromide, although not sure what John used it for except to scare us young men. We (camera men) always jokingly moaned about Olive making tea only for John until one morning when we went to the studio to get our film cut, we were met with a cup of tea each. "Don't worry, I've put in the milk, sugar, etc." said John, On the table next to the cups was a bottle of milk, a sugar bowl and the pot of bromide. None took the risk or asked for tea again.
I can't remember the name of the Bournemouth firm, unfortunately although both names have a familiar ring ("Bailey" for obvious reasons)
Terence Baggett said… Paul, hope this is of interest.
Yes, the 250 was a pleasure to use. The lens was excellent and with Ilford's FP3 file grain film, the image was crisp; capable of a very big blow-up. The film cartridges were perfect for the sandy beach conditions and never scratched the negatives. Although the controls on the 250 look fiddly now, it was simple and quick to use with practice, even if you did have to use a match to change aperture. With the large volume of shots we took, we could all take well positioned walkie shots without even looking through the tiny viewfinder. A real case of "feel the force". I still find that the informal "shooting from the hip" produces the best shots and best catches the moment, even with today's digital auto-everything nonsense (I now need 15min to look up the manual to be able to override the auto stuff when I used to make a near instant adjustment).
Chambers made a tradition of taking a group photo of the team each year. I still have one, taken in front of the Kiosk around 1967??. Would like a scan of this? If so how could I get it to the forum?
I like your schedule of beach photographers. One correction: Chambers did not do postcard prints; they sold triplicate prints 3-up B&W portrait on a landscape sheet with nothing printed on the back, except the serial number. Their darkroom was in the basement of a row of shops opposite King George III statue with the Kiosk on the other side of the statue, on the prom. Chambers must have had around 9 250s, maybe more, all black.
Chambers did have a Kenprinter, printing on rolls of paper. The finished prints were not glazed. I did not use the Kenprinter (a printer was employed) but rainy days were, for us camera operators, darkroom days: printing the backlog of enlargements.
There were many firms taking walkies in Weymouth. Chambers was the only firm that had a long record from 1920, unbroken except for WW2. The beach was available for licence in 2 parts and Chambers always had the larger southern part and some years had both parts. A firm called Meeches occasionally had the lesser north part, from the Jubilee Clock to Greenhill with a Kiosk near the clock and darkroom in on the the beach facing Georgian terraces. I worked on that pitch for 2 years before joining Chambers although this was for different companies, both were colour and with glazed prints (heat glazing prints near sand is a bad idea); one was a local photography shop trying its hand and the other was a Bournemouth beach photography company trying to expand. Neither lasted more than one year and neither used leicas.
There were other pitches in the town, away from the beach:
National Media Museum, Bradford
Victoria and Albert Museum's photography collection
Photographic History Research Centre, Leicester
De Montfort University. MA course Photographic History and Practice
The Press Photo History Project This project is currently mapping the photo agencies and photographers of Fleet Street and the UK
The correspondence of William Henry Fox Talbot
National Monuments Record at English Heritage
UAL Photography and Photography and the Archive Research Centre
www.rps.org/group/Historical Royal Photographic Society's Historical Group
www.londonstereo.com London Stereoscopic Company / T. R. Williams
www.earlyphotography.co.uk British camera makers and companies
Fox Talbot Museum, Lacock.
National Portrait Gallery, London
http://www.freewebs.com/jb3d/>
Alfred Seaman and the Photographic Convention
Frederick Scott Archer
© 2013 Created by Michael Pritchard.
Powered by