Information and discussion on all aspects of British photographic history
Time: March 22, 2011 to May 21, 2011
Location: UCR/California Museum of Photography
Street: 3824 Main Street Riverside
City/Town: CA 92501
Website or Map: http://www.cmp.ucr.edu/
Phone: 951-827-4787
Event Type: exhibition
Organized By: UCR/California Museum of Photography
Latest Activity: Mar 22, 2011
Export to Outlook or iCal (.ics)
MySpace Tweet Facebook Facebook
In announcing the invention of the daguerreotype to the French Academy of Sciences in 1839, Daguerre and his colleague Arago were quick to point out what they perceived as the photograph's main flaw: its lack of color. While scientists and some photographers attempted to find the means to render color through the camera, many studios employed colorists who would hand-paint photographs. Colorists typically blushed subjects' cheeks, jewelry was emphasized or embellished, and adding pigment to the sitters' fine clothing was also not unusual. However, as photography shifted from plates ñ like the ambrotype seen here, or the daguerreotypes in Eye Contact on the third floor - to paper, some colorists became a little more heavy-handed. In the two small cartes de visite on display, the photograph itself is almost completely obliterated by its overpainting.
In 1901, as the first potentially viable color photographic processes were being unveiled, George Bernard Shaw proclaimed, "As to the painters and their fanciers, I snort in defiance at them; their days of daubs are over." The processes that Shaw lauded were complicated and therefore more costly, so that commercially hand-colored photographs remained relatively common and popular. In Asia, hand-colored albumen prints were made primarily for the tourist trade. In the United States, photographer William Amos Haines sold straight black-and-white prints in addition to his hand-colored panoramic photographs. The Universal Portrait Company dispatched door-to-door salesmen to pedal their airbrushed portraits; business records in UCR/CMP's collection show that this was relatively lucrative.
Although color photography found its way to the mainstream by the mid-twentieth century, artists continued to paint on photographs, but their intention in doing so was different. Rather than attempting to represent the scene in living color, as photographic colorists previously had, photographers like Gail Skoff now sought to amplify or alter reality through color. Others, including Holly Roberts, use painting to obscure and alter the photograph completely. These contemporary painted works push the boundaries of artistic media and are a far cry from the subtle tinting of early photography, a medium that Baudelaire once
Victoria and Albert Museum's photography collection
National Science and Media Museum
RPS Journal 1853-2012 online and searchable
Photographic History Research Centre, Leicester
Birkbeck History and Theory of Photography Research Centre
William Henry Fox Talbot Catalogue Raisonné
British Photography. The Hyman Collection
The Press Photo History Project Mapping the photo agencies and photographers of Fleet Street and the UK
The correspondence of William Henry Fox Talbot
Historic England Archive
UAL Photography and Photography and the Archive Research Centre
Royal Photographic Society's Historical Group
www.londonstereo.com London Stereoscopic Company / T. R. Williams
www.earlyphotography.co.uk British camera makers and companies
Fox Talbot Museum, Lacock.
National Portrait Gallery, London
http://www.freewebs.com/jb3d/
Alfred Seaman and the Photographic Convention
Frederick Scott Archer
© 2023 Created by Michael Pritchard.
Powered by
RSVP for Artifical Colouring: Painting in Photography to add comments!
Join British photographic history