Information and discussion on all aspects of British photographic history
Apollo magazine poses the question do UK museums take photography seriously and provides a useful survey of how photography is looked at in the UK, with comment from Martin Barnes, Colin Ford and Michael Pritchard. The question is contextualised around the move of the RPS Collection from Bradford to London. https://www.apollo-magazine.com/do-uk-museums-take-photography-seri...
Image: Shop sign, rue Geoffroy-St-Hilaire, Paris, (c. 1900), Eugène Atget. © Victoria and Albert Museum
Add a Comment
I have some sense about British Museums, but more of those in the U.S. There may be some historic anxiety among curators as to whether photography is an art or not over its technological basis, and we can add as the article points out, a photograph's shifting meaning. However, there is a problem, and is one that creates considerable difficulty, is its popularity with the public. Only King Tut and the Impressionists can compete with photography here in the US, and I suspect this is also the case in Britain.
It's not if a photography show is mounted, that no one will come, photography almost always overwhelms everything else -- a turnstile spinner if you will, and that creates tension among staff. A number of years ago the LA County Museum of Art had two major shows, one of statues and artwork showing images of Buddha, and the other, a photography show. What was shown in photography, escapes me now, though I believe it was work from Leonard Vernon's collection. The Buddha show was a major curatorial effort and mounted at a considerable expense. The photography show was much less of an effort. The Buddha exhibit took up a major portion of space in the museum and the photography exhibit took up a modest room. Needless to say, one outstripped the other in attendance and it's unnecessary to point out which.
I have served on the advisory board of the Museum of Photographic Art in San Diego California and as a board member of the now defunct Photography Council of the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles. I've heard more than once a curator say something to the effect of, "We can't stick our heads up too high," when the issue of a photography show was discussed. Of course, in a situation like at a photography museum like MOPA, sticking one's head up too high is not an issue, but in a generic art situation, it is.
MOCA in Los Angeles had de-siloed its curatorial staff. They only had "art" curators and not curators were not designated as to specialty. This created a somewhat opposite effect as traditional forms of photography were being ignored. That's a long story in itself but that led eventually to the withdrawal of the Photography Council.
Granted, shows should not be determined purely on a popularity basis though I know enough to say that it is internally important to the museum, whether it is stated or not.
An excellent article, however it would have been good to perhaps have a less England-centric view of collecting and exhibition. I feel that reaching out to curators north of the border, or how things are done in Wales etc would have made for some interesting contributions.
Victoria and Albert Museum's photography collection
National Science and Media Museum
RPS Journal 1853-2012 online and searchable
Photographic History Research Centre, Leicester
Birkbeck History and Theory of Photography Research Centre
William Henry Fox Talbot Catalogue Raisonné
British Photography. The Hyman Collection
The Press Photo History Project Mapping the photo agencies and photographers of Fleet Street and the UK
The correspondence of William Henry Fox Talbot
Historic England Archive
UAL Photography and Photography and the Archive Research Centre
Royal Photographic Society's Historical Group
www.londonstereo.com London Stereoscopic Company / T. R. Williams
www.earlyphotography.co.uk British camera makers and companies
Fox Talbot Museum, Lacock.
National Portrait Gallery, London
http://www.freewebs.com/jb3d/
Alfred Seaman and the Photographic Convention
Frederick Scott Archer
© 2023 Created by Michael Pritchard.
Powered by
You need to be a member of British photographic history to add comments!
Join British photographic history