British photographic history

Information and discussion on all aspects of British photographic history

Joseph Nicéphore Niépce’s contribution to the history of photography has been elevated after the National Media Museum and the Getty Conservation Institute revealed new findings stemming from three of Niépce’s photographic plates.

The findings have been announced at a two-day Niépce in England conference at the National Media Museum in Bradford.

"Recent technical analysis by Getty Conservation Institute scientists Dusan Stulik and Art Kaplan has shown three of the photographic plates Niépce brought to England, which now reside at the National Media Museum, are not only his finest work, but also demonstrate a range of different photographic experiments – a portfolio of sorts – which he intended to show The Royal Society," say the two organisations involved in the findings.

At the heart of the discovery is the Un Clair de Lune plate, which was made in 1827. While that plate was long thought to have been enhanced with etching, it is actually a photograph without any hand tooling at all, the researchers say. "The secret process developed by Niépce? A pewter plate with a deposit of light-solidified material which resembles the resin obtained when heating lavender oil, which helped the plate accept the image." The plate is the first and only known example of this process.

Commenting on the discovery, senior scientist Stulik says: "Our findings are shining a different light on the early history of photography than has been previously described in literature. We have been able to create a fuller picture of Niépce and how he worked, and we can really demonstrate that everything related to photography that surrounds us today – digital cameras, film, TV, even 3D and videogames, go back to his inventions."

The plates were examined using nondestructive Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to identify the organic components of the image layer and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy to determine the composition of the metal plates. High resolution digital microscopy also revealed details of the image structure.

Niépce brought the plates to England in 1827 to demostrate the techniques to The Royal Society, hoping to be admitted. "Unfortunately, during his time in England The Royal Society was in turmoil and Niépce was unable to share his experiments, his ambitions crushed. He died in 1833, leaving his sometimes collaborator Louis Daguerre to publicly reveal photography to the world in 1839," explains the National Media Museum.

"Of the four known surviving plates taken to England by Niépce, three reside in the National Media Museum’s Royal Photographic Society Collection and one is on display at the Harry Ransom Center at the University of Texas at Austin – known as the First Photograph."

For more information, visit the museum website.

Views: 263

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of British photographic history to add comments!

Join British photographic history

Comment by Ian Glover on October 17, 2010 at 22:17
Hi Michael.
I went to the second day of the conference and found the event stimulating. Especially the guy snoring as he slept through the Barbara Brown talk.
I have accessed the museum's archive with students many times over the past twelve years as a programme leader (BA (hons) Photography currently at The University of Bolton) and found the support and help from the team extremely warm and well informed. I've attended many talks and events at the museum, it's a great place.
Comment by Michael Pritchard on October 15, 2010 at 17:42
Terry makes a good point. As was noted during the meeting there is more work to do and new questions have arisen that need answering.
Comment by Terry King on October 15, 2010 at 16:26
The results of the research into the make up of the 'moonlight' plate were indeed interesting but that still leaves us with question of what do the images on 'the first photograph', the 'Amboise' plate and the 'Christ carrying the cross' plate consist. My own experience of making such platers suggests that they are etched surfaces resulting from sulphur in the asphaltum.They do not consist of asphaltum as had been thought.
Comment by bill purvis on October 15, 2010 at 7:43
This news resonates with a sense of clarity France was indeed the birthplace of the earliest photographic processes. It is fantastic that modern scientific forensics are able to provide indisputable evidence.

© 2019   Created by Michael Pritchard.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service