All Posts (4851)

Sort by

12201014072?profile=originalCheltenham was one of the first towns in the country to establish a professional photographic studio and has one of the oldest camera clubs. The book, marking the 150th anniversary of Cheltenham Camera Club, reviews the history of photography in the town and its leading figures such as Hugo van Wadenoyen and Dr E. T. Wilson, physician, philanthropist, a pioneer in photomicrography, co-founder of the Cheltenham Photographic Society and father of polar explorer Edward A. Wilson. It outlines technological developments in photography and sets the photographic scene in Cheltenham into the wider social context, ending with a summary of photography in Cheltenham today.

Illustrated, 76 pages. 210 x 148 mm

ISBN: 978-0-9931482-0-0

Published by Cheltenham Camera Club.

£10 (includes postage and packing in UK)       

further details: www.cheltenhamcameraclub.co.uk

Read more…

12201000679?profile=originalThe Association of Leading Visitor Attractions visitor figures for 2014 have brought mixed fortunates for photography. The National Media Museum showed a 10 per decline from 2013 with 431,328 visitors and a 63rd ranking.

More positively, particularly in the light of the proposals to cut hours and staff, the Library of Birmingham had 2,414,860 visitors and was ranked 10th - the only non-London venue to appear in the top ten. 2014 was its first full year of opening. 

The original data can be found here: http://www.alva.org.uk/details.cfm?p=423

12201016268?profile=original

Read more…

Q+A with curator, Colin Harding

12201007067?profile=originalThere's an interesting Q+A with Colin Harding, the curator of the exhibition Drawn By Light which opens at the National Media Museum on 20 March (admiission is free) after a very successful run at London's Media Space. There is an associated day of events and activities at the Museum on 21 March.

See: http://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/q-a/11032015-q-and-a-colin-harding

More information on Drawn by Light and Museum events around the exhibition can be found here: http://www.nationalmediamuseum.org.uk/planavisit/exhibitions/drawn-by-light/about

12201007277?profile=original

Read more…

12201013655?profile=originalThe annual William Herschel Society President's Lecture will take place on Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 7pm at the Bath Royal Literary and Scientific Institution, 16-18 Queen Square,Bath BA1 2HN. It will be given by Dr Alan Chapman, Wadham College, Oxford, titled: John Herschel: Optician, Natural Philosopher & Astronomer by Inheritance.  

Sir John Herschel was a scientist and astronomer like his father, Sir William Herschel. In 1809 he entered the University of Cambridge; in 1812 he submitted his first mathematical paper to the Royal Society, of which he was elected a Fellow the following year. An accomplished chemist, Herschel discovered the action of hyposulfite of soda on otherwise insoluble silver salts in 1819, which led to the use of "hypo" as a fixing agent in photography. In 1839, independently of William Henry Fox Talbot, Herschel also invented a photographic process using sensitized paper. It was Herschel who coined the use of the terms photography, positive, and negative to refer to photographic images. In 1820 Herschel became a founding member of the Royal Astronomical Society. From 1833 until 1838, his astronomical investigations brought him and his family to the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa, where he met Julia Margaret Cameron, who became a lifelong friend. In 1850 Herschel was appointed master of the Mint, but he resigned six years later due to poor health. His remaining years were spent working on his catalogues of double stars and of nebulae and star clusters.

Allan Chapman has been based at Oxford University for most of his career, as a member of the Faculty of History, Wadham College. He is an accomplished lecturer and public speaker (including as visiting professor at Gresham College in London). In January 1994, he delivered the Royal Society History of Science Wilkins Lecture, on the subject of Edmund Halley.

He is also a television presenter, notably 'Gods in the Sky', covering astronomical religion in early civilisations, and 'Great Scientists', presenting the lives of five of the greatest thinkers. Not averse to other forms of television, he also participated in the TV quiz 'University Challenge – The Professionals' as part of the Royal Astronomical Society team, broadcast in June–July 2006

Tickets on the door: Students £4, Visitors £5

See: http://www.williamherschel.org.uk/events.htm

Read more…

12201006664?profile=originalThe current issue of Source magazine 81 (Winter 2014/15) takes a look at the future of photography archives. It has collated the visitor numbers for some of the UK and Ireland's principal archives - Imperial War Museum, Birmingham Central Library, English Heritage, National Portrait Gallery, National Library of Wales, National Photographic Archive (Ireland), National Media Museum and National Museums (N.I.) - between 2009 and 2014, Nearly all show a decline in user numbers which can possibly be attributed to digitisation and new ways of making those archives available. More cynically, but perhaps realistically, the fact that in many cases the cut in opening hours and staffing have prevented public access. A second chart gives a snapshot of the costs of those archives and the number of staff, where the institution has provided the information.

Sarah Macdonald, formerly curator of the Getty Images Archive and Roger Hargreaves, a curator for the Archive of Modern Conflict in London, are quoted. 

Read more…

History is Now at Hayward

Can anyone report on the exhibition up through 26 April at the Hayward Gallery "History is Now" in which artist-curators "take on Britain" since WWII? April 16, Laura Guy, curator, writer and lecturer at Goldsmiths, presents her research focusing on "the recent histories of British photography".

Read more…

12201008684?profile=originalBlockbuster exhibition Only in England: Photographs by Tony Ray-Jones and Martin Parr is to tour venues throughout the UK after the Science Museum Group secured a National Lottery grant of almost £70,000. The two-year tour has been made possible by funding from Arts Council England’s Strategic Touring Programme, which aims to bring major shows to a wider range of venues beyond the established national touring circuit.

Only in England features nearly 200 prints by two of the most distinguished and influential British photographers of the last 50 years. Inspired by what they saw as uniquely British traditions and eccentricities, Tony Ray-Jones and Martin Parr photographed people and communities around the UK from large towns to small coastal resorts. Touring their iconic work to some of these locations, the exhibition offers an opportunity for local communities to engage with a one-of-a-kind photography experience.

Kate Bush, Head of Photography, Science Museum Group, said: ‘I’m delighted that Only in England has been selected by Arts Council England to receive this support. It’s wonderful to see our exhibition programme recognised in this way and it’s exciting that many more people will be able to see this truly significant part of our world class National Photography Collection.’

The exhibition, which opened the Science Museum’s Media Space in September 2013, met with critical acclaim and welcomed 43,968 visitors during its run in London, before transferring to the National Media Museum in Bradford. The exhibition is currently open at National Museums Liverpool’s Walker Art Gallery until 7 June 2015.

Image: Location unknown, possible Morcambe, 1967-68 by Tony Ray-Jones. © National Media Museum

Read more…

12201004877?profile=originalI have an albumen carte-de-visite (image shown here) photograph featuring three portraits of three different people made by prominent 19th century Wellington photographer, James Bragge in New Zealand. Printed on the right side of the card is 'The Triptographic Cameo Portrait Registered'. I haven’t been able to find out anything about this process/format - does anyone else know?

Many thanks, Lissa

12201004877?profile=original

Read more…

Light Box

12201013252?profile=originalThe photographer Norman McBeath and poet Robert Crawford have just completed a collaboration called Light Box which was launched at the Royal Society of Edinburgh. A digital version of Light Box can be viewed through this link:  https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/digitalhumanities/node/199

Light Box celebrates light in all its aspects – solar, sacred, scientific, nourishing, and poetic. The work juxtaposes a series of  haiku by Robert Crawford with black and white photographs by Norman McBeath. The relation between poems and pictures is often teasingly oblique: neither simply illustrates the other. Instead, they ‘resonate’ together, each enhancing the other.

Exactly 150 years ago the great Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell published his most influential paper on electromagnetism (a paper crucial to Einstein). Maxwell had a scientific instrument called a ‘light box’. Nineteenth-century scientists sometimes wrote of light ‘resonating’. This new Light Box was produced after the poet and the photographer met leading physicists who work in optoelectronics.

The work is presented as a limited edition (10) loose leaf, boxed set in a black buckram, archival quality, solander box with silver gilt title and published by Easel Press.The colophon is signed by poet and artist.
Light Box was specially commissioned by the University of St Andrews as a contribution to the UNESCO International Year of Light. Further details about the International Year of Light can be seen through this link:  http://www.light2015.org/Home.html
Norman McBeath lives in Edinburgh and has over sixty portraits in the collections of the National Portrait Galleries in London, Edinburgh and Canberra. Robert Crawford is Professor of Modern Scottish Literature at the University of St Andrews. His biography of TS Eliot, recently published by Cape and by Farrar, Straus & Girou, was featured on BBC Radio 4's Book of the Week.
Read more…

Auction: Photography - 5 March 2015

12201005871?profile=originalBloomsbury Auctions is holding an auction next week which includes a significant number of nineteenth century photographs from W H F Talbot, Julia Margaret Cameron, and other significant British and French photographers. The catalogue can be seen online here

Image: Julia Margaret Cameron (1815-1879), Mrs Herbert Duckworth (Julia Jackson), 1867.

Read more…

12201008061?profile=originalAlthough more than a thousand of my Autumn 1981 Britain-taken photos went missing between 1981 and mid-1987, I still have enough of my Britain-taken images in my possession for a decent portfolio of work. Included in that portfolio are quite a few environmental portraits I took around London that Autumn. (I have been able to hold onto nearly all my photos taken from mid-1987 forward.)

I wish I still had my portraits of London housemate Pinkie Virani (a noted Indian author and human rights advocate now) and Calvin Lawrence, my London roommate, who now edits abc.com in New York City.

Environmental portraits I took in 1981 London that I still own copies of include: Jim, a then-unemployed court porter by a statue of Samuel Johnson and a taxi; a Dustman smoking on the job; a Guitar Busker playing across from Covent Garden; a Homeless Man coughing at Charing Cross; an Anglo-Asian Man reading in Soho; and a Woman looking through the window of a blue van at an outdoor market.   

These six mentioned portraits may not seem spectacular at first, but they are honest-enough images of everyday people involved in everyday life. I hope you see merit in these portraits of people, which are candid, or in the cases of Jim and the Dustman, spontaneously posed, all in natural settings.

Environmental Portraits Around 1981 London, by Photographer & Writer David Joseph Marcou.

Read more…

Autumn 1981 was a very memorable time for me and my writing and photography. Though I didn’t meet our group’s individual requirement of writing at least 12 feature stories (I did 8 or 9, all edited by our moderator/editor John H. Whale, who wore many hats at the Sunday Times including chief proofreader, the latter job shared by him with his wife, Judith), I did take 2,000-4,000 good photos then.  My peers in the Sunday Times intern-group from the Missouri Journalism School did not take nearly as many photos, unless they were much more secretive journalists than I surmised.

After the first two weeks, I found myself without a good story idea. So I set out walking one day with my camera from our group’s large flat in Islington, and walked 3-4 miles up and down different streets than usual, eventually sensing I was close to the Sunday Times Building. As I walked near it, I came upon a small art gallery advertising a show by a British neo-mannerist painter Erica Daborn, who had done some paintings inspired by “Elephant Man”, an award-winning play. I entered, found no-one in the gallery, took some shots of the paintings, and someone emerged. Long story short, I arranged an interview with the artist, took several photos of her with her paintings, sent my original slides and story to the Baltimore Sun newspaper, and didn’t hear back. I learned then to always make copies of your photos (and stories) or find out later perhaps, how valuable they are to people other than you, the photographer (and writer).

I was a relative newcomer to photojournalism, but not to writing ironically. As years have passed, that London semester inspired me to author and publish many books and articles about Picture Post Magazine and its staff, and to write many reviews of British books too. For one thing, I wrote the first complete history of Picture Post; my book's title is “All the Best”. I also wrote and published my dual biography of that magazine's lead-photographer Bert Hardy and writing mate James Cameron covering the Korean War in 1950, “Crucial Collaborations”, and my biography of Mr. Hardy, “The Cockney Eye”.

In Autumn 1981, though, I wrote some pretty fair stories too – including my published report about a very tense meeting between 50 IRA relatives and then Cardinal of England Basil Hume in the rectory of Westminster Catholic Cathedral; my unpublished report about the only professional Palestinian theatre troupe in the world then, El-Hakawati; my published report on a then-recently-begun, but fast-developing theatre in Islington, the Almeida; and my published report about Archie Shepp’s renowned quintet at the Camden Jazz Festival, with emphasis on Shepp’s trumpeter, Charles McGhee. I took photos in all these places, but no longer own any of these latter images. Photographers, beware: Guard your originals with your life, because there are people who want them, especially if you have a bit of talent and have photographed in the right places at the right times.

I photographed for some of my housemates/fellow interns then too, including Marynelle Hardee, Louis Trager, Cal Lawrence, and Dan Higgins. I’ve no photos left from my shoot of Union Chapel with Marynelle (she kept them and needn't have); only 1 photo left of my shoot at the Billingsgate Fish Market with Louis (I later lost them I guess and Louis had begged me in Missouri to let him publish some of them with his magazine article, but the only image I liked of mine from that shoot showed market-men in white coats and dark caps in a logjam of boxed, frozen fish on carts, and the article needed more than 1 photo; I've still got a copy of that somewhat soft-focus image somewhere, but haven't been able to find it recently); no photos left of my shoots relating to skin-head culture for Cal; and only 5 photos left of my shoot near Covent Garden with Dan Higgins (he kept some fairly good negatives for his story, though he needn't have). In addition to my taking a roll of film of street traffic from the roof of the Drury Lane Theatre (Dan wanted a rooftop view of traffic including a taxi), I also managed four good images of the distant rooftops (including two good views of Covent Garden) seen from the Drury Lane's roof. We also commandeered an office window kitty-corner from Covent Garden, and I remember my photos of that historic building across the way suggesting a high-speed zephyr train. When I went down to photograph the Garden from inside with Dan, we stopped briefly so I could photograph a guitar busker out front; it's a photo that's been published often, and likely will be published many more times too.

Also, walking and busing about London, and to and from Surrey via train to interview and photograph Bert Hardy, I took some pretty fair images I still own. In addition to my very good photos of Bert and his dogs, 2 of my photos at the British Museum stand out – a guard smoking just outside an entryway; and people exiting and entering an entryway, the latter of which I photographed from the inside looking out. I also took a photo on the train back from the Hardy's titled "2 Ages of Woman", which matches up fairly well with a photo I took in London, "2 Ages of Man".

And just up the street from my fairly good photo-portrait in Soho of an Anglo-Asian man in hat and coat reading a newspaper, I photographed two Chinese restaurant employees having a smoke on break. Also, I've written about and included some selections on this blog of my London children's day centre photos, of which I only own about 10 percent of the almost 800 photos I took on that personal, month-long 1981 assignment, though not a bad 10 percent because they were prints made from my first-edits in 1982 or so.

At the London Zoo, I took a series of photos (some black-and-white, some color) of Chia-Chia, a panda who was then said to have sired the fetus the “mother” panda was supposed to have inside her. It was a false pregnancy, which makes my best portrait of Chia-Chia even more poignant; he seems to be saying in that image, “Oh me, oh my, what will we ever do now?”

Other photos stolen and/or lost include my stills of a garbage truck and the men manning it, one of who was pushing refuse along a curb with a push broom; he wore a French beret and looked a bit like my Grandfather Marcou. Which reminds me, I took some fairly dramatic photos I soon lost of dark green and bright orange garbage cans by an old, low-slung building. The colors reminded me of the two sides in Northern Ireland, where my editor, John Whale, had already reported famously about the hooded men, of the IRA I believe.

Three transparencies I’d set aside were to be given to Mr. and Mrs. Whale when I departed England as a gift, I ended up having to give them to Pinkie Virani, a housemate staying in London a few more days, to relay to the Whales. I asked Pinkie to first have the Grove Hardy darkroom (owned by Gerry Grove and Bert Hardy) -- which printed the first 8X10 of my best Bert photo-portrait with dogs, a copy of which is now in the British National Portrait Gallery Collection -- make some color prints to give to Mr. and Mrs Whale. Mr. Whale told me years later he never saw those images. Earlier, I had a large print of one of my panda photos made, and gave it to the Whales, who seemed to love my view of Chia-Chia chewing leaves or grass. One of the three final-gift images was my photo of the Union Jack I photographed from our group's large office area on the top floor of the Sunday Times Building; a second was my photo of two little Anglo-African girls in Brixton, with unusual perspective; and a third was my photo of an empty baby carriage outside a shop by a Marlboro cigarette ad-poster.

I was fairly inexperienced about and free-wheeling with my original images in those days. For instance, one of my first nights in London, I walked to the Sunday Times Building from my temporary lodgings, the Melville bed-and-breakfast. I came upon a homeless man sleeping under tungsten lights on the front step of a corner store, photographed him, felt guilty, and put a pound coin in his pocket while he slept. New to this business of cadging photos that way, I felt so bad afterward I tried flushing some of my slides down a toilet (the others I may have simply put in a wastebasket). I don’t know if any of them were recovered by anyone, but they were dramatic-enough images.

Also, I learned a stinging lesson from my second ex-wife, who apparently absconded with a bag filled with 688 of my best early negatives in 1987 and then had the gall around that time to force me to destroy some of my best 8X10 prints (some of those prints were of women I'd photographed in South Korea but not all of them), including I believe my most nostalgic photo from 1981 London. In the latter case, I’d cadged a shot of two teen-aged girls in long coats walking ahead of me on a Thames Embankment stairway. Other people were alongside the stairway, including a handsome, middle-aged man (perhaps with a lady friend) in spring jacket with silver hair looking out at the Thames and maybe smoking too. One of the two girls, maybe both, wore pigtails. I’d looked at that photo often before 1987 and thought this is what street photography is all about -- a nicely taken, cadged shot, showing everyday people doing everyday things with a bit of aplomb. Maybe my memory exaggerates that image a bit, because I have been without that print so long. But I hope its negative and others by me not now with me, are rediscovered for me and mine while I and my offspring still live and are well, because I know a top administrator (MB) for Getty Images who's critiqued my work for me for many years, very rarely has said one of my photos is good, but he has a strong interest in those 688 "lost" negatives, because he’s long said my early black-and-white work is the best photography I’ve ever done.

That nostalgic view along the river was taken by me on Thames Day, and a little farther up the embankment minutes later, I photographed disabled teenagers in kayak races, with Parliament in the distance. I photographed and met Rudi Christopher then, and later visited him at Lord Treloar College (at Alton I believe), where he lived and was a student; I later photographed him at Treloar too. I'd been sending some of my stories to my J-School adviser Daryl Moen, and I sent him my story about Rudi, who dreamed of driving an 18-wheeler for a living, though he had spina bifida. (Rudi was a national paralympic champion in two sports.) Unfortunately, I, for the first time, decided to send my processed Rudi films for printing, separately to the Mizzou J-School photo lab (attn: Angus McDougall) and my films apparently never arrived there. My story about Rudi, though, sent to Prof. Moen, was published in the Columbia Missourian soon after, but without photos.

If I’ve learned key lessons about retaining my original photos (and writings) and any good copies made of them too, one is that proper conservation and retention of your works pays dividends, if not always monetarily initially (though in November 1981 I did have my first paid-use photos published, in Missouri Life Magazine, 6 of my photos from Hannibal, MO), at least in the decent levels of recognition your works can achieve. Over time, then, even monetary compensations will be obtained, hopefully for the photographer, his/her heirs, and the archives/publishers he/she has put trust in. In addition to the British National Portrait Gallery, I’ve many photos and writings in some of the very best public and private archives in the world, and more than 80 of my books are in some of the world’s very best libraries too, including in various archives and libraries of the Smithsonian in Washington, DC.

Learning to Retain Photos: Images from 1981 England, by Photographer and Author David Joseph Marcou.

Read more…

12201013282?profile=originalI photographed Bert Hardy, the great Picture Post photojournalist, at the same time as our second-ever interview at his Surrey estate in late November 1981, as per the Hardy's wishes. I only have two remaining photo-portraits of him from among several I took of him that day. My second now ex-wife apparently pilfered in 1987 my 2 rolls of film (one black-and-white, one color) from that shoot. I've a third image taken by me on the Hardy's estate that day, of his dogs Lizzie and Kim playing along a trail by a tree.

I have no negatives from that shoot except three copy-negatives, but do have some vintage prints my early photo-technicians made for me. Mrs. Sheila Hardy, Bert's widow, told me ca. 2005 that she knows I took my portraits of Bert because she said she was there with us at the time they were taken.

In 2003, the Hardy's darkroom manager Charlie Keeble printed for me an archival 6X9 print of Bert leaning in a doorway with his dogs yelping at his feet. Since I asked Mr. Keeble to also print one for the British National Portrait Gallery, he did and offered to deliver it himself to the NPG, which he soon did. It was accepted into the NPG Photographs Collection, ca. Dec. 2003 I believe the NPG documents indicate. That photo-portrait by me is published on the front-cover of my 50,000-word biography of Bert Hardy, 'The Cockney Eye', which I published in early 2013, just-prior to Bert's birth-centennial.

On the day I photographed Bert Hardy, I also photographed a friend of his from the Rank Film Company, a tall man in trench coat and fedora hat wearing eyeglasses who stopped by briefly. I no longer have photos of the Rank man or Mrs. Hardy, but before my negatives of that shoot were pilfered I had quite a few 4X6 prints made in Wisconsin, and sent them to Sheila Hardy.

The three photos I still own from that day (all taken by me) I've published often (online and in print). I believe the British NPG print of Bert and his dogs taken by me has the catalogue number NPGx126230 on it.

Though I've published my other remaining portrait of Bert Hardy many times (of him seated by his living room window with a pen in hand), I don't know that any archive I've offered it to so far has accepted it into its permanent collection. I believe it's a very rich photo portrait. I took it originally in color, but now only have the cropped black-and-white version of it.

Bert Hardy lived from 1913-1995. At last check in 2014, his widow, Sheila, was still living.

By David Joseph Marcou, Photographer & Writer in Wisconsin.

Read more…

Stereo Daguerrotype

12201003864?profile=originalI have a beautiful stereo Dag, written on the back in pencil is "Flight into Egypt". The subject is Mary and baby Jesus on an ass, the material is white, could be marble or porcelain and there is nothing to indicate scale. I have searched the internet for the subject without luck, but somebody thought it worth photographing during the 1840s. The glass is cracked and needs to be replaced, I might find out more when I unwrap the image. I have taken advice about doing this so happy to undertake the job, but any further advice would be welcome. I would like to know who took the picture, UK or USA if the note on the back is contemporary, when and if possible where. Not much to ask for! Will post an image when I find out how to. DonB

12201003864?profile=original

Read more…

12201011699?profile=originalAlthough I didn’t fully realize it in Autumn 1981 when I was a member of the Missouri-London Reporting Team and a London Sunday Times Intern, one assignment I chose for myself (not part of the regular writing program, which was directed by John H. Whale) was to photograph a children’s day centre in Highbury/Canonbury, London, and Picture Post great Bert Hardy had also photographed a British children's day centre about 30 years before...writes David Joseph Marcou. I’d photograph Mr. Hardy memorably later in 1981.

I first obtained formal permission in writing from the District Education Authority. Margaret Johnson, I believe, was the day centre’s director. She was very helpful, as was her chief assistant, Gloria -- or was her name Gladys?

The timing for my coverage was in October or November 1981 or both. Although I wanted to show a composite day of activity there over the full month, including a dusk shot of it from the building next door (where George Orwell apparently once lived), I couldn’t get clearance from the man in charge of that next-door building to take the just-after-dark shot. Each time I visited the centre, I took pictures about an hour.

Children of all backgrounds attended the centre (one little girl wore a mink coat, but most of the centre's kids were from working class families). My favorite subjects may have been the great 3-year-old artist Demien, whose drawings adorned many areas inside the centre; and Lucy, a little girl reading (I was told an ancestor of hers was a famous evolutionist). Demien was Anglo-African, as was his friend Jonathan. I took facial shots of Demien, and the two friends together too, though I was asked not to identify any children if my photos of them were published at that time. My best portrait of Demien was my black-and-white picture-postcard image of him for my one-man photo show in Seoul’s Pine Hill Gallery and Restaurant in Feb. 1987.

Along the way, I also photographed a laundry attendant at her ironing board, and the teacher Elizabeth helping a little girl get her winter coat on, which indicates my assignment probably wrapped up in mid-November or so. In addition, I like my photo of two little girls kibbitzing on the centre’s back door steps as they put on their coats, the teacher/playwright Bob helping a little boy learn to swim on a day trip to a nearby indoor pool, and a little boy kissing his mom as she drops him off one morning (though I no longer have a copy of the latter image).

I also photographed a teacher tucking in a little girl for her nap, a little girl seeming to sneak out of recess (I thought a child sneaked out for recess, not out of it), and a little girl being walked into the kitchen area by Gloria. Other favorite photos are of a small group of kids eating breakfast as a teacher oversees things, and Gloria receiving newspapers, etc., from a shop deliveryman at one of the centre’s gates as a small boy with toy golf club looks on.

My second now-ex-wife seems to have pilfered many of my best early negatives and slides, including most of my day centre images; I’ve still got 50 or so day centre prints I believe. I’d taken about 15 rolls of 36-exposure Agfa color 400 ASA negative film, a couple rolls of 36-exposure Agfa color 400 ASA transparency film, and 1 or 2 rolls of Ilford black-and-white 400 ASA negative film. In Wisconsin later, I had at least the color negatives made into contact sheets, and sent one set (there may have been two sets, but I can’t recall that for sure) to Margaret Johnson. I never heard back from her, though.

One of my journalism housemates, now an attorney, Marynelle Hardee, asked me later what that children’s day centre shoot was all about. I hope it was about very good photography, and getting reacquainted with the child side of life for positive reasons. Readers/viewers can be the judge.

Photographing a London Children’s Day Centre for a Month in Autumn 1981, by David Joseph Marcou, Photographer and Author.

Read more…

12201012698?profile=originalAn album of seventy photographs by Oscar Gustav Rejlander, one of the most important photographers of the 19th century is at risk of export unless a UK buyer can be found. Culture Minister Ed Vaizey has placed a temporary export bar on the album of portrait and figurative photographs by Oscar Rejlander (1813-1875), which includes prints of “Trying to Catch a Fly” and “The Fly is Caught”, providing a last chance to keep it in the UK.

News of the album being offered at auction was reported exclusively at BPH last August - click here - and in a follow up post here.

Born in Sweden, Rejlander settled in England in the 1840s. His pioneering work in combination printing - combining several negatives to form one image - brought him wide renown, and earned him the moniker “the father of art photography”. A highly influential figure in his time, he was regarded by contemporaries as a major star of the photographic world.

Culture Minister Ed Vaizey said:

The Rejlander album is a truly remarkable compilation of images by one of the great pioneers of photography. I hope a UK buyer can be found so that the album can undergo further study here in the UK. It would also be a tremendous addition to the nation’s photographic archive.

The album contains an exceptional selection of Rejlander’s work. Whilst a few of the prints are well known and some can be found in other UK collections, the majority are previously unknown studies. The compiler of the album is currently a mystery, and further investigation into their identity and that of many of the sitters, as well as the album’s provenance, could reveal a wealth of information to researchers.

Culture Minister Ed Vaizey took the decision to defer granting an export licence for the album following a recommendation by the Reviewing Committee on the Export of Works of Art and Objects of Cultural Interest (RCEWA), administered by Arts Council England. The RCEWA made their recommendation on the grounds that it was of was of outstanding significance for the study of the history of photography and for our wider understanding of nineteenth century art.

Christopher Wright from the RCEWA said:

Rejlander was one of the most popular photographers of his day, famous for pioneering combination prints and for his illustrations in Darwin’s The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. This particular album, a rare survival, is known to have been shown to both Pope Pius IX and the Prince of Wales (the future Edward VII), who was an enthusiastic collector of his work.

The decision on the export licence application for the album will be deferred for a period ending on 23 April 2015 inclusive. This period may be extended until 23 July 2015 inclusive if a serious intention to raise funds to purchase the album is made at the recommended price of £82,600.

Organisations or individuals interested in purchasing the album should contact RCEWA on 0845 300 6200.

See a digital version of the album

Read more…

12201012083?profile=originalWe all think we know what photographs are, and why we have them...writes Elizabeth EdwardsDe Montfort UniversityPhotography's default history is told as art – it shouldn't be. Photographs are everywhere. For the past 150 years they have penetrated, entangled and perhaps defined almost every area of human endeavour that we care to name – medicine, industry, tourism, relationships, archaeology, social policy – and that’s just for starters. They have rendered both the visible and invisible in certain ways that have shaped our world.

Some of the earliest efforts to represent that world are to be found in the Tate Britain’s new exhibition Salt and Silver, featuring salt prints taken between 1840 and 1860. Salt prints are the result of the first negative/positive process that made photography the reproducible form with which we are familiar. They are beautiful and jewel-like, their photographic chemicals absorbed deep into the fibres of their papers. It gives them a softness which, combined with fading caused by chemical instability, produces ethereal qualities quite unlike anything else. These are precious, connoisseurial objects, the exhibition strap-line – “rare and revealing” – makes that clear to us.

But these fragile and precious prints (they cost a fortune at auction) caused me to ponder the kinds of photographic histories are presented to the public. Why does the default value of photography always seem to be “art”? This implies that photography’s ultimate purpose is aesthetic discernment and expression. But I don’t think that this alone communicates the importance or power of photography.

David Hill & Robert Adamson, Five Newhaven Fisherwomen, c. 1844. © Wilson Centre for Photography

Other histories

This was really brought home to me when I belatedly visited the Science Museum’s Drawn by Light, an array of material from the Royal Photographic Society’s collection. Science and photographic practice were important strands in the exhibition. But these interests slipped almost seamlessly into a narrative of photography’s aesthetic aspirations and the great names of the photographic canon: from Julia Margaret Cameron to Martin Parr. Despite some interesting juxtapositions, somehow they crowded out the other important voices.

It’s a shame that this is the photographic history that is told by default. There are hundreds of photographic histories, in science, medicine, architecture, industry. But these are too often shoe-horned into a category called “art” to be made visible or interesting.

Edouard Denis Baldus, The Floods of 1856, Brotteaux Quarter of Lyon, 1856. © Wilson Centre for Photography

Recently I was talking to a colleague working on industrial photographs. These provide a visual narrative of how we have structured an economic base, of practices that have involved the labour of thousands upon thousands of ordinary people (that category beloved of politicians). Fascinating, but nobody wanted to do an exhibition because this was not “art”, he was told.

There are a multitude of reasons for this: the institutional and disciplinary investments in making photographs one kind of thing and not another, the siren pull of the art market which dictates what is desirable and important and what is not. But what of the rest – the photographic workhorses that have shaped ideas since the 1850s? While pleasingly evident in new academic work, they are largely written out of gallery agendas, except as the odd foray into “comparative material”.

The cosy canon

Canons of anything come with a cosy conceptual cogency. They provide frameworks, which save you the hard work of thinking outside the box. Certainly other kinds of photographs intrude into gallery spaces. But they often do so – not because of their intrinsic historical interest, but because they appeal to contemporary aesthetic sensibilities.

It is in this way that some 19th-century photographers have been “recognised” through the application of those sensibilities. This might be as proto-modernists (Roger Fenton’s The Queen’s Target for example), surrealists (the fascination with a photograph Benjamin Stone took in 1898), post-modernists or whatever. Juxtaposed with contemporary art photography this may be fun and quirky and provide an interesting provocation. But I’m not sure it does anything to explain the richness of photography’s contribution to the way we see the world. It doesn’t challenge us, it doesn’t explain why we, as an exhibition-going public, need to know about it.

William Fox Talbot, Articles of China, 1844. © Wilson Centre for Photography

There are, of course, notable exceptions. Autograph’s brave and ghastly, but historically and emotionally compelling, exhibition Without Sanctuary (2011) on American lynching photographs, was all the more shocking because the photographs were presented as cultural objects, scruffy, damaged postcards that people wrote on and handled.

Or the Photographer’s Gallery Mass Observation: This is Your Photo (2013) which integrated photographs with the wider archive. Even more so their current exhibition Human Rights Human Wrongs. But these important forays tend to be stand-alone, issue-led exhibitions rather than integrated into histories of photographic culture.

Auguste Salzmann, Statuette en Calcaire; Type Chypriot 1858-1865. © Wilson Centre for Photography

This brings me back to the Tate exhibition. The content of the salt prints is wide and varied, signalling how the all-embracing reach of photography was seeded from the beginning, yet that it tends to get lost in the aesthetic and connoisseurial histories of photography that dominate, as we are asked to contemplate the fine object.

But the photographs here are more than precious and beautiful objects. Photographs of Middle Eastern antiquities were perhaps part of a desire for scientific archaeological evidence in an imperial age. Others are part of the post-rebellion political need for consolidation through a search for authentic origins of Indian heritage – one later refigured within nationalist frameworks (Linneaus Tripe’s architectural studies in India).

Yet perversely the very immediacy of photographs also confronts us with the unknowability of other people’s lives in other ages. That is what makes them so compelling and opens them to possibilities beyond structures of the canon – if we allow them to.

The Conversation

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Professor Elizabeth Edwards. A visual and historical anthropologist, Professor Edwards has worked extensively on the relationships between photography, anthropology and history, on the social practices of photography, on the materiality of photographs and on photography and historical imagination.

She has previously held posts as Curator of Photographs at Pitt Rivers Museum and lecturer in visual anthropology at the University of Oxford, and at the University of the Arts London.

In addition to major monographs, she has published over 80 essays in journals and exhibition catalogues over the years, is on the board of major journals in the field including Visual Studies and History of Photography.

She is currently working on late nineteenth and early twentieth century photographic societies and networks of photographic knowledge, on the market in ‘ethnographic’ photographs across scientific and popular domains in the nineteenth century, and the relationship between photography and historical method.

Read more…

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives